Thursday, August 30, 2012

Comparing Tempest to Typical Shakespearean Comedy

                Pop music follows a pattern: a catchy tune and a theme of love, typically sexually centered. Fantasy stories follow a pattern: an otherwise minor character undergoes an adventure and becomes a big shot hero.  There is a good reason that TvTropes seems as accurate as it does: because every form of entertainment media follows the same patterns in some sense. In this way, The Tempest follows the standard pattern for Shakespearean comedy. For instance, Ferdinand and Miranda fall in love at first sight in Act I, although they exchange vows earlier than in most comedies (Act III, with Prospero’s approval in Act IV, rather than Act V) because, unlike most comedies, the center of focus of the play is not on their love affair but on Prospero, the proper comedic character, and because their love does not require the end of the book’s façade.
                Prospero is the proper comedic character because, unlike Miranda, he is responsible for his own position; in his obsessions with his books, he abandoned his position to his brother and was surprised when his position was usurped. While he may be somewhat nonsensical in his obsession, it is an understandable nonsensicality – he is not randomly crazy, merely obsessed, which is an understandable circumstance that maintains his sanity as a character while allowing him to guide most of the insanity in the play. His return to his senses, when he breaks his staff and abandons his magic, ends the magical, dream-like element to the play and concludes the play with a comic solution that both resolves the situation of the magic and the character Prospero’s obsessions by indicating that he has given up said obsessions with the sacrifice of his magical power.